ÈÍÈÎÍ ÐÀÍ

Àâòîð ðàññìàòðèâàåò ôðàãìåíòèðîâàííîå ñìûñëîâîå ïðîñòðàíñòâî «ýòíîïîëèòèêè», ïðèáåãàÿ ê ýëåìåíòàì ñåìàíòè÷åñêîãî àíàëèçà, - ðàçëè÷åíèþ ðàêóðñîâ ïðåäìåòà, ñâÿçàííûõ ñî ñòàòóñîì äåíîòàòà (ðåôåðåíòà), ñ îäíîé ñòîðîíû, è ñòàòóñîì ñèãíèôèêàòà (ìûñëèòåëüíîãî îáðàçà) - ñ äðóãîé ñòîðîíû. Ýòíè÷íîñòü ðàññìàòðèâàåòñÿ â ñåìàíòè÷åñêèõ ïîëÿõ policy (êàê êóðñ) è politics (êàê ñôåðà), à òàêæå ñ òî÷êè çðåíèÿ ñåìàíòè÷åñêîé âàëåíòíîñòè â ñî÷åòàíèÿõ ñ êîíöåïòàìè «êîíôëèêò» è «ìîáèëèçàöèÿ».

The author focuses on fragmentation of the meanings space of a «ethnopolitics» with a help of the semantic analysis elements - distinguishing the subject related to the status of denotation (referent), on the one hand, and to the status of signification (intellectual image), on the other hand. Ethnicity is analyzed in the semantic areas of policy (as a course) and politics (as a field) and also from the view of semantic valency in the combination with the concepts of «conflict» and «mobilization».

ýòíîïîëèòè÷åñêîå, äåíîòàòíûå è ñèãíèôèêàòíûå ïîëÿ, ñóáúåêòû "ýòíîïîëèòèêè", ýòíè÷íîñòü êàê policy è êàê politics, êîíôëèêò è ìîáèëèçàöèÿ

ethnopolitical, the fields denotation and signification, "ethnopolitical" actors, ethnicity as a politics and as a politics, conflict, mobilization