Ïîêàçûâàåòñÿ, ÷òî èäåÿ èñòîðè÷åñêèõ ðàçëîìîâ è ïîêàç èñòîðè÷åñêè ñêëàäûâàþùèõñÿ «î÷åâèäíîñòåé» Ì. Ôóêî òðåáóþò îòêàçà îò íîðìàòèâíûõ ñòàíäàðòîâ ñâîáîäû è ñïðàâåäëèâîñòè, êëþ÷åâûõ äëÿ ñîâðåìåííûõ êîíöåïöèé âëàñòè, è ïåðåñìîòðà êðèòè÷åñêèõ è îñâîáîäèòåëüíûõ ñòðàòåãèé, íà íèõ îñíîâûâàþùèõñÿ (êðèòèêà èäåîëîãèè, áîðüáà ñ ãîñóäàðñòâåííûì íàñèëèåì, ïîèñê êîíñåíñóñà è ò.ä.). Ðàññìîòðåíèå âëàñòè íà óðîâíå ñîöèàëüíûõ ïðàêòèê âåäåò ê èíûì òàêòèêàì â îòíîøåíèè âëàñòè, êîòîðûå ïðåäñòàâëåíû â äàííîé ñòàòüå.

This article argues that the idea of historical cleavages and the demonstration of historically developed «obviousnesses» of M. Foucault demand to forsake normative standards of freedom and justice that are crucial for contemporary concepts of power, and to reconsider critical and emancipatory strategies that are based on those concepts (critique of ideology, struggle against state violence, seeking consensus, etc.). Considering power at the level of social practices leads to other tactics towards power, that are described in this article.

ñòðóêòóðàëèçì; ïîñòñòðóêòóðàëèçì; êîíöåïöèÿ âëàñòè-çíàíèÿ; äèñöèïëèíàðíîå îáùåñòâî; îáùåñòâî êîíòðîëÿ; íîðìàòèâíûå ñòàíäàðòû ñâîáîäû; äèñêóðñ; âëàñòíûå ïðàêòèêè; àíîíèìíàÿ äèêòàòóðà; ìàðãèíàëèçàöèÿ; ñåòåâîå âçàèìîäåéñòâèå.

structuralism; post-structuralism; power-knowledge concept; «disciplinary society»; «control society»; normative standards of freedom; discourse; power practices; «anonymous dictatorship»; marginalization; networking.