Ñòàòüÿ ïðåäñòàâëÿåò ñîáîé àíàëèç îñíîâíûõ èíòåðïðåòàöèé êîíöåïöèè ìîäåðíèçàöèè â ñòðàíàõ ÅÑ è Ðîññèè. Àâòîðû ïðèõîäÿò ê âûâîäó, ÷òî â Ðîññèè äîìèíèðóåò ñìåñü «ïîñòïîëèòè÷åñêîãî» è àâòîðèòàðíîãî ïîíèìàíèÿ ìîäåðíèçàöèè, ÷òî ñîçäàåò îïðåäåëåííûå äèñêóðñèâíûå äèñáàëàíñû â ïîëèòè÷åñêèõ îòíîøåíèÿõ ñ Åâðîïîé, êîòîðàÿ ÷àñòî îïèñûâàåò ñåáÿ â êà÷åñòâå ñóáúåêòà, ïðåîäîëåâøåãî ìîäåðíèñòñêóþ ïàðàäèãìó.  Ðîññèè êðèòèêà çàïàäíîãî ïîñòìîäåðíà íîñèò ðåòðîãðàäíûé õàðàêòåð è ïðèçâàíà óâåñòè îáùåñòâî îò íåîáõîäèìîãî íîðìàòèâíîãî äèàëîãà ñ Åâðîïîé.

The article fleshes out the dominant interpretations of modernization in the EU countries and Russia. The authors come to the conclusion that in Russia a mix of «postpolitical» and authoritarian versions of modernization prevails, which creates some discursive disconnections in the political relations with Europe, which much stronger accentuates socio-political connotations of this concept. Though Europe claims to reach beyond the modernity paradigm, some of its policy instruments have a lot to do with modernity. Criticism of European post-modern is feasible, yet in Russia it usually takes a retrograde form and is conducive to bringing the society away from the much needed normative dialogue with Europe.

critical theory, Modernization, normative dialogue, post-modern, Êðèòè÷åñêàÿ òåîðèÿ, ìîäåðíèçàöèÿ, íîðìàòèâíûé äèàëîã, Ïîñòìîäåðí

critical theory, Modernization, normative dialogue, post-modern, Êðèòè÷åñêàÿ òåîðèÿ, ìîäåðíèçàöèÿ, íîðìàòèâíûé äèàëîã, Ïîñòìîäåðí