Óêðåïëÿÿñü (÷òî åñòåñòâåííî äëÿ ëþáîé âëàñòè), âëàñòíàÿ âåðòèêàëü â òî æå âðåìÿ òåðÿåò ñîöèàëüíûé êàïèòàë è íå íàõîäèò òåõ ñõåì ñîöèàëüíî-ýêîíîìè÷åñêîãî âçàèìîäåéñòâèÿ ñ îñíîâíîé ìàññîé íàñåëåíèÿ, êîòîðûå ïðåäîïðåäåëèëè áû âîçðàñòàþùóþ êîíêóðåíòîñïîñîáíîñòü ñòðàíû â ìèðîâûõ ïðîöåññàõ. Âûõîä ñâÿçàí ñ íàõîæäåíèåì îïòèìàëüíîãî áàëàíñà ãîðèçîíòàëüíûõ è âåðòèêàëüíûõ ñîñòàâëÿþùèõ, ïðåæäå âñåãî â ñôåðå ñîöèàëüíî-òðóäîâûõ îòíîøåíèé.

Striving for consolidation (which is natural for any power) the authority vertical loses at the same time its social capital and misses the routes of social and economic interaction with the most of the population which could determine the growth of the country's competitiveness in the world. The solution lies in finding the optimal balance between horizontal and vertical components, firstly in the sphere of social and labor relations.

ÂËÀÑÒÍÀß ÂÅÐÒÈÊÀËÜ, ÍÀ×ÀËÎ ÕÕI Â, ÎÁÐÀÒÍÀß ÑÂßÇÜ, ÏÎËÈÒÈ×ÅÑÊÀß ÑÈÑÒÅÌÀ, ÐÎÑÑÈß, ÑÎÖÈÀËÜÍÛÉ ÊÎÍÒÐÀÊÒ

AUTHORITY VERTICAL, EARLY 21 ST CENTURY, POLITICAL SYSTEM, REVERSE COMMUNICATION, RUSSIA, SOCIAL CONTRACT, SOCIAL RESPONSE