Ïîêàçûâàþòñÿ ðèñêè, êîòîðûå âîçíèêàþò â ñâÿçè ñ ïðîâåäåíèåì ïîëèòèêè èìïîðòîçàìåùåíèÿ è ðàçâèòèåì òåíäåíöèè ê äåãëîáàëèçàöèè ðîññèéñêîé ýêîíîìèêè. Îáîñíîâûâàåòñÿ íåîáõîäèìîñòü ïðîâåäåíèÿ âçâåøåííîãî èìïîðòîçàìåùåíèÿ äàæå â óñëîâèÿõ îáîñòðåíèÿ ãåîïîëèòè÷åñêîãî ïîëîæåíèÿ Ðîññèè è ïîèñêà íîâûõ ýôôåêòèâíûõ ïóòåé âñòðàèâàíèÿ â êàðäèíàëüíî ìåíÿþùååñÿ â óñëîâèÿõ ÷åòâåðòîé ïðîìûøëåííîé ðåâîëþöèè ìåæäóíàðîäíîå ðàçäåëåíèå òðóäà.

The article shows the risks that arise in connection with the policy of import substitution and the development of the process of de-globalization of the Russian economy. The need to carry out the deliberate import substitution even in conditions of an aggravation of Russia's geopolitical position and search for the new effective ways to integrate to the international division of labor which is cardinally changing in conditions of the fourth industrial revolution is confirmed.

Èìïîðòîçàìåùåíèå, îïîðà íà ñîáñòâåííûå ñèëû, äåãëîáàëèçàöèÿ, êîíêðóðåíòíîñïîñîáíîñòü, ÷åòâ¸ðòàÿ ïðîìûøëåííàÿ ðåâîëþöèÿ

Iport substitution, self-reliance, de-globalisation, competitivness, fourth indusrtial revolution.