ñòàòüå ïîêàçàíî îäíîâðåìåííîå âëèÿíèå íà íà÷èíàþùèõ äîñòîåâñêîâåäîâ ðóáåæà 1910–1920-õ ãîäîâ (Ì.Ì. Áàõòèíà, Á.Ì. Ýíãåëüãàðäòà, Â.Ë. Êîìàðîâè÷à) èäåé íåîêàíòèàíñêîé ôèëîñîôñêî-ýñòåòè÷åñêîé øêîëû, ñ îäíîé ñòîðîíû, è ðóññêîé ðåëèãèîçíî-ôèëîñîôñêîé, â òîì ÷èñëå ñèìâîëèñòñêîé, ìûñëè – ñ äðóãîé. Íà ýòîì ôîíå ðàñêðûòà îñîáàÿ ðîëü Â.È. Èâàíîâà, ÷üè ðàáîòû î Ô.Ì. Äîñòîåâñêîì ñûãðàëè ðåøàþùóþ ðîëü â ñàìîîïðåäåëåíèè äîñòîåâñêîâåäåíèÿ êàê íàóêè, ñòàâ ñâÿçóþùèì çâåíîì ìåæäó ñóãóáî ðåëèãèîçíî-ôèëîñîôñêîé èíòåðïðåòàöèåé ïèñàòåëÿ è ïîñëåäóþùåé ìåòîäîëîãèåé, îáóñëîâëåííîé íåîêàíòèàíñêîé «ïðèâèâêîé».

The simultaneous influence of neo-kantian philosophical and esthetic school on the beginning scholars engaged in Dostoyevsky research, such as M. Bakhtin, B. Engelgardt and V. Komarovich, at the boundary of the 1910–1920 th, on the one hand, and Russian religious and philosophical thought, including the influence of symbolism, on the other, is shown in the paper. In this connection the special role of V. Ivanov’s works on Dostoyevsky is disclosed as playing a crucial role in the transformation of knowledge on Dostoyevsky into science, and a link between entirely religious and philosophical interpretation of the writer and the subsequent methodology caused by neo-kantian «inoculation».

Ô.Ì. Äîñòîåâñêèé, Â.È. Èâàíîâ, íåîêàíòèàíñòâî, ðåëèãèîçíàÿ ôèëîñîôèÿ, äîñòîåâñêîâåäåíèå, Ì.Ì. Áàõòèí, Á.Ì. Ýíãåëüãàðäò, Â.Ë. Êîìàðîâè÷.